Received: from e55.webcom.com (e55.webcom.com [206.2.192.66]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.5/8.7.5-MZ) with ESMTP id TAA06856 for <DWARNER@ALBANY.NET>; Wed, 17 Apr 1996 19:29:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost by e55.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA244983577; Wed, 17 Apr 1996 16:26:17 -0700
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1996 16:26:17 -0700
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Message-Id: <199604172318.TAA02228@norden1.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: Tim Krego <tkrego@norden1.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re:
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
At 04:38 PM 4/17/96 -0400, you wrote:
>> Is the Lightwave Windows NT/Intel version based on the Win95 version
>> or the Windows NT/Alpha version?
>
>Neither. There's no real "based on" relationship between any of the
>Windows versions--there's a single Windows version of the source code.
>And there's only one Intel binary.
That answers my question. I should have know that anyhow looking at my
CD-ROM contents.
I mainly asked to find out about multithreading.
>(BTW, this is a good example of "begging the question," which means
>asking a question that assumes an answer, *not* saying something which
>provokes a question.)
Well if you want to start disecting all these posts based on all their
logical fallicies you can start with all the MAX vs LW discussions.